Most teams discover their SOAR bottlenecks during a phishing flood or patch Tuesday chaos, not in a vendor demo. Working across different tech companies, I have seen playbooks stall on approval steps, integrations break under bursty alert loads, and “automation” fail when enrichment calls time out. The payoff is real though, because AI and automation shaved an average of $1.88M off breach costs in 2024 according to IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach Report. My take, if you wire SOAR to do sane deduping, automated enrichment, and least privilege containment, you will save analysts time and avoid expensive cleanup.
Global information security spending is projected to hit $213B in 2025, up from $193B in 2024, per a July 2025 Gartner forecast. I analyzed 13 SOAR and adjacent automation platforms, then narrowed to four that consistently delivered on integration breadth, playbook flexibility, and case management. In this guide you will learn where each tool fits, what to watch for in deployment, and how to estimate spend from credible benchmarks.
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
A security orchestration and automation platform that centralizes case management, playbooks, and collaboration for incident response. It is built for high‑volume workflows with a marketplace of ready‑to‑use content packs and integrations.
Best for: Large SOCs or MSSPs standardizing workflows across a big tool stack and multiple teams.
Key Features:
- Security‑focused case management with incident workspaces and collaborative “war room” notes and commands.
- Visual playbook builder with reusable tasks and sub‑playbooks.
- Broad integration marketplace covering email, EDR, threat intel, cloud, and ITSM.
- Built‑in reporting and dashboards for SOC metrics.
- Optional threat intelligence management add‑on for feed ingestion and indicator curation.
Why we like it: Mature marketplace content accelerates time to first automation, and the case management model suits SOC handoffs and post‑incident audits.
Notable Limitations:
- Steep learning curve and heavy infrastructure footprint reported by users, especially at scale.
- Performance slowdowns under bursty alert loads and container overhead have been raised in peer feedback.
- Design changes and integration quirks can require a dedicated automation engineer.
Pricing: Pricing not publicly standardized. A UK G‑Cloud listing shows £225,409.80 per year for an enterprise unit, and notes a promotional trial option, which gives a directional benchmark for public sector buyers (G‑Cloud listing). Private reseller SKUs also exist with varied MSRPs, so confirm scope and term with your channel.
IBM QRadar SOAR
SOAR platform with dynamic playbooks and strong case management, plus a Breach Response module designed to map privacy notifications and tasks during incidents.
Best for: Regulated industries that need privacy breach workflows baked into incident response, and teams that want flexible, dynamic playbooks.
Key Features:
- Visual playbook designer with conditional logic and dynamic branching.
- Case management with audit trails and tasking.
- Breach Response module mapping tasks to hundreds of global privacy regulations.
- Integrations to SIEM, EDR, ITSM, and threat intel tools.
- Multi‑team collaboration for security, legal, HR, and privacy.
Why we like it: The privacy and breach workflows reduce spreadsheet sprawl when legal notification requirements kick in, which is where many IR programs struggle.
Notable Limitations:
- Users report setup complexity and occasional sluggish workflows.
- Integration coverage for some vendor ecosystems can require customization.
- Upgrade and plugin versioning can be finicky in mixed SIEM and SOAR deployments.
Pricing: Pricing not publicly available. Contact IBM or a partner for a custom quote. Note, IBM sold the cloud QRadar SaaS threat management assets to Palo Alto Networks in September 2024, but QRadar on‑prem and QRadar SOAR remain supported by IBM; Palo Alto announced end of life only for the acquired QRadar SaaS line in April 2025. See coverage in the IBM investor update, the transaction close and EOL notices from Palo Alto Networks and IBM’s support advisory.
Splunk SOAR
Orchestration, automation, and case management tightly aligned with Splunk Enterprise Security, available in cloud and on‑prem editions with a visual playbook editor.
Best for: Teams already on Splunk Enterprise Security that want native automation, or hybrid SOCs that need both on‑prem and cloud options.
Key Features:
- Visual playbook editor with Python and prebuilt blocks.
- Case and event management with workbooks and tasking.
- Hundreds of third‑party connectors and thousands of automated actions.
- On‑prem and cloud deployment options with an Automation Broker for network‑segmented actions.
- Role‑based access and audit trails.
Why we like it: If Splunk is your SIEM of record, Splunk SOAR reduces glue code and gives mature playbook tooling that tracks well with Splunk data models.
Notable Limitations:
- Reviews cite a learning curve, documentation gaps, and integration friction in some Microsoft and IAM stacks.
- Cost is frequently mentioned as premium.
- Version compatibility between SIEM and SOAR components needs careful planning during upgrades.
Pricing: Pricing not publicly available. Splunk SOAR release cadence and support windows are documented, but commercial terms are negotiated. Since March 18, 2024 Splunk has operated as a Cisco company, and products continue under the Cisco Splunk brand, which is confirmed in Cisco’s acquisition close and third‑party reports from Reuters.
Rapid7
No‑code SOAR focused on quick wins, with hundreds of prebuilt plugins and cloud‑hosted options to avoid on‑prem orchestrators for many workflows.
Best for: Resource‑constrained teams that want pragmatic automation across cloud, SaaS, and ITSM without heavy infrastructure.
Key Features:
- Drag‑and‑drop workflow builder with human approvals and chat triggers.
- Large plugin library spanning EDR, email, threat intel, cloud, and ITSM.
- Cloud‑runnable plugins to eliminate some on‑prem orchestrators.
- Alert triggers to kick off workflows from detections and SIEM alerts.
- Execution metrics and job history for tuning.
Why we like it: It is one of the faster paths to automate phishing triage, account disables, and ticket hygiene when you do not have a dedicated automation engineer.
Notable Limitations:
- Some reviewers cite plugin maintenance, manual updates, and the need for scripting skills for advanced cases.
- Documentation depth varies by plugin, which can slow troubleshooting.
- Complex cross‑tool workflows may require careful error handling to avoid brittle runs.
Pricing: Public list pricing for InsightConnect is limited. One AWS Marketplace private‑offer listing shows InsightConnect at $60,000 per year for unlimited users including deployment services, which is directional and varies by term and scope (AWS Marketplace private offer). Rapid7 publishes starting prices for other Insight products, but not for InsightConnect, so plan for a custom quote and term negotiation.
Security Orchestration Tools Comparison: Quick Overview
| Tool | Best For | Pricing Model | Free Option | Highlights |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cortex XSOAR | Large, multi‑team SOCs and MSSPs | Custom enterprise licensing via channel | Trial availability varies by program | Deep marketplace content and SOC‑grade case management |
| IBM QRadar SOAR | Regulated orgs with privacy reporting needs | Custom enterprise licensing | None publicly listed | Dynamic playbooks, strong breach response workflows |
| Splunk SOAR | Splunk ES shops, hybrid deployments | Custom enterprise licensing | Not publicly advertised | Native alignment with Splunk data and workflows |
| Rapid7 InsightConnect | Lean teams seeking fast wins | Custom enterprise licensing, some marketplace offers | Not publicly advertised | No‑code builder, cloud‑runnable plugins |
Security Orchestration Platform Comparison: Key Features at a Glance
| Tool | Playbook Builder | Case Management | Integrations Library |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cortex XSOAR | Visual builder, reusable sub‑playbooks | SOC‑oriented incidents with war room collaboration | Broad marketplace covering EDR, email, intel, ITSM |
| IBM QRadar SOAR | Dynamic, condition‑based playbooks | Audit‑ready tasking and timelines | Wide coverage across SIEM, EDR, ITSM, intel |
| Splunk SOAR | Visual editor plus Python | Workbooks and task templates | Hundreds of connectors and thousands of actions |
| Rapid7 InsightConnect | No‑code builder, human approvals | Job history and metrics for runs | Large plugin catalog across cloud and ITSM |
Security Orchestration Deployment Options
| Tool | Cloud API | On‑Premise | Air‑Gapped | Integration Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cortex XSOAR | Yes | Yes | Possible with on‑prem, verify requirements | Plan for an automation engineer in complex estates |
| IBM QRadar SOAR | Yes | Yes | Possible with on‑prem, verify requirements | Medium, increases with custom privacy workflows |
| Splunk SOAR | Yes | Yes | Possible with on‑prem, verify requirements | Medium to high, depends on SIEM version alignment |
| Rapid7 InsightConnect | Yes | Light on‑prem needs for some plugins | Not a common pattern, verify requirements | Medium, simpler for cloud‑first stacks |
Security Orchestration Strategic Decision Framework
| Critical Question | Why It Matters | What to Evaluate | Red Flags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Do we need privacy breach workflows baked in? | Legal clocks start fast during breaches | Native breach playbooks, reporting to regulators | Manual spreadsheets, ad hoc legal steps |
| How many tools must we automate on day one? | Integration scope drives time to value | Marketplace depth, plugin maturity, rate limits | Heavy custom code to reach basic coverage |
| What is our scale and change frequency? | Bursty alerts and upgrades stress SOAR | Queuing, retries, rollbacks, version pinning | Playbooks that fail silently under load |
| Are we Splunk ES or Palo Alto heavy? | Native alignment reduces glue code | Connectors, case linking, shared data models | Forked playbooks to route around ecosystem gaps |
Security Orchestration Solutions Comparison: Pricing and Capabilities Overview
| Organization Size | Recommended Setup | Monthly Cost | Annual Investment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100–500 employees | Rapid7 InsightConnect for phishing triage and access resets, expand later | Varies by term and bundle, pricing not public | Estimate via private offers or bundles, request quotes |
| 500–5,000 employees | Splunk SOAR if Splunk ES is core, or Cortex XSOAR for broad toolchains | Varies, pricing not public | Expect enterprise quotes, term and volume discounts |
| 5,000+ employees or MSSP | Cortex XSOAR or IBM QRadar SOAR with privacy workflows | Public sector reference price exists for XSOAR on UK G‑Cloud | Use UK G‑Cloud reference and AWS Marketplace examples to anchor negotiations |
Problems & Solutions Section
-
Problem: Phishing triage overwhelms analysts during monthly waves.
How each tool helps:- Cortex XSOAR has widely referenced phishing content packs and user stories showing automated URL and attachment analysis, end‑user notifications, and mailbox scoping that cut false positives, with published examples of large public sector reductions in phishing workload during automation programs (customer outcomes article).
- Splunk SOAR reviews consistently highlight automation for incident resolution and system isolation, which maps well to phishing and mailbox remediation tasks, as summarized in G2 feature breakdowns.
- Rapid7 InsightConnect community discussions and docs describe phishing workflows built from O365 or Gmail triggers with sandbox and intel enrichment, which aligns to quick wins for small teams, see examples in the Rapid7 community and docs references like the phishing workflow thread and workflow best practices in Rapid7’s documentation (best practices).
- IBM QRadar SOAR’s playbook designer and breach response capabilities help standardize evidence capture and notification when credential theft becomes a reportable incident, which third‑party marketplaces summarize in their product overviews (SoftwareOne overview).
-
Problem: Version and ecosystem shifts complicate roadmaps.
How each tool helps or what to watch:- Splunk SOAR continues with frequent releases and clear support windows, but buyers should factor the Cisco acquisition into vendor management and roadmap review, as confirmed in Cisco’s closing announcement.
- IBM divested QRadar SaaS threat management to Palo Alto Networks in September 2024, then Palo Alto announced EOL for the acquired SaaS in April 2025. IBM continues to support QRadar on‑prem and QRadar SOAR, which is detailed in IBM’s support advisory and Palo Alto Networks’ close and EOL notices.
- User feedback highlights that Cortex XSOAR can demand significant engineering effort and can slow under high load, so plan for tuning and container resource planning, as seen in real‑world threads on r/cybersecurity.
-
Problem: Budget holders want evidence for ROI.
How each tool helps you make the case:- Use macro data points to frame savings, the global average breach cost reached $4.88M in 2024 and organizations that adopted AI and automation saved $1.88M on average, per IBM’s 2024 report.
- Anchor pricing conversations to third‑party references. For example, a public sector listing shows a six‑figure annual price point for XSOAR on UK G‑Cloud (G‑Cloud listing) and an AWS Marketplace private offer shows InsightConnect at $60,000 per year for unlimited users including deployment services (AWS Marketplace private offer).
- Reviews of Splunk SOAR and InsightConnect document time savings from automation and incident closure, which helps translate playbook adoption into reduced mean time to respond and fewer manual tickets (G2 Splunk SOAR, G2 InsightConnect).
Putting It All Together
If your stack is already centered on Splunk ES, Splunk SOAR keeps data and automation under one roof, but plan for training and thoughtful version alignment, which many buyers mention in G2 reviews. If privacy notifications matter, IBM QRadar SOAR’s Breach Response workflows reduce legal scramble, and third‑party marketplaces reiterate its 200‑plus regulation mapping in their summaries (SoftwareOne overview). If you need the broadest content ecosystem and SOC‑grade case management, XSOAR stands out, though expect engineering lift and budget scale reflected in public sector and reseller references (UK G‑Cloud price point). For small teams seeking fast impact, InsightConnect is a strong candidate, and AWS Marketplace references provide useful starting numbers for planning (AWS private offer example).
Two final data points to keep in your deck, IBM reports the global average breach cost hit $4.88M in 2024, with automation producing seven‑figure savings on average (IBM breach report press release), and Gartner expects information security spending to reach $213B in 2025, which keeps SOAR investments top of mind for CISOs in the next budget cycle (Gartner 2025 forecast).
